ENGL 470E Syllabus | LarissaLai.com

ENGL 470E Syllabus

PAGE CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION

FACULTY OF HUMANITIES

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH

ENGLISH 470E: Race, Class, Gender, Memory and Citizenship Winter 2009-2010

Instructor: Dr. Larissa Lai

Section 4

Classroom: Buch D332

Time: MWF 13:00 – 14:00

Office: BuTo 526

Phone: 604-822-2096

Email: larissa.lai@ubc.ca

Office hours: Mondays and Fridays from 11:30am – 12:30pm or by appointment

Course description:

This course will begin with the conundrum of reclaiming the racist name, to look at anti-racist work in the late 80s and early 90s in Canada. The conundrum is an old one, proposed originally by Hegel as the master/slave dialectic. By claiming racialization as a way of recognizing the past, the subaltern is always connected to the name of the master (whiteness). But this reclamation was also extremely culturally productive in Canada at the end of the 20th century. We will begin by looking at the oppositional work that arose at the moment, particularly in relation to other oppressions (including class and gender) and the contradictions it produced. In the second section of the course we will move on to consider one of its offshoots-the problem of memory, particularly as it is linked to trauma. The course will close with a gesture towards agency, particularly in relation to global citizenship as it has recently been refigured in relation to changes in the practice of “nation.” Can old democratic principles be refigured beyond the nation to return humanism to us in newly productive ways? If not, is there still a place for agency in Canadian literary production, and what might it look like?

The point of this course is to deepen your literary and critical skills. Participation and group work will be essential components of the class. This course assumes that its participants have an interest in anti-racist pedagogy, and bring a critical awareness of race, class and gender issues with them when they enter the classroom.

Course Goals:

By the end of this course, students will be able to explain how anti-racist politics in Canada in the 80s and 90s created cultural space for racialized texts and writers. Students will be able to explain the political and creative conundrums that arose from those politics and illustrate how a few Canadian writers solved the problems, however contingently. In particular, students will be able to explain how cultural trauma gives rise to narratives of mourning, recovery and redress. Through several theories of agency and citizenship, students will be able to offer productive suggestions for further writing and research that recognizes both difference and hope.

This course assumes university-level of competence with regards to research, composition, documentation (MLA) and classroom conduct.

Texts and readings:

Brand, Dionne. What We All Long For. Toronto: Knopf, 2005.

Maclear, Kyo. The Letter Opener. Toronto: Harper Collins, 2007.

Chariandy, David. Soucouyant. Vancouver: Arsenal, 2007.

Clements, Marie. Burning Vision. Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2003.

Stone, Anne. Delible. Toronto: Insomniac, 2007.

Custom coursepack available at the UBC Bookstore.

Assignments

1.      Best five out of six reading quizzes (10%). Note, then, that you can miss one quiz without penalty. However, no make-up quizzes will be given under any circumstances.

2.      In-class Peer-assessed Essay (30%). You will write an in-class essay on a set topic (some choice given). The following class, you will do peer-assessments on the essays of two other students. Peer feedback on your original essay with be returned to you, along with my comments shortly thereafter. One option for your final project will then be to pursue the comments, questions and suggestions of your peers to produce a polished final paper. This project should constitute one of the major learning exercises of the course.

3.       Group Presentation (value determined in relation to participation portfolio)

4.      Participation Portfolio (20%) containing: your name, your group name, group members’ full names, your group presentation, in-class quizzes, completed peer assessment rubrics for group mates. You may also include a reading journal, reflections (questions, comments, additions, disagreements) on other groups’ presentations, and any substantive correspondence between yourself and your group mates, if you wish.

5.   Final Project (40%): a polished version of one prior project- the peer-assessed paper or the group presentation; or a new project- either a conventional academic paper or critical-creative project that addresses the concerns of the course (8 double-spaced pages or equivalent). If you are at all in doubt about the form or content of your final project please come see me. Collaborative projects are also welcome. Please discuss collaboration with me beforehand. Please attach your mid-term (peer-assessed) paper or project, plus assessments, regardless of which final project option you choose. There will be a one third of a grade reduction (eg. from B to B-) as penalty for missing this aspect or any part of it. (40%)

Classroom conduct:

Classroom conduct will be guided by the following purposes and values:

  • to promote free inquiry and debate
  • to act as a community of scholars
  • to lead and inspire societal development
  • to respect, appreciate, and encourage diversity
  • to display care and concern for community
  • to act as a community of scholars
  • to lead and inspire societal development
  • to respect, appreciate, and encourage diversity
  • to display care and concern for community

In our classroom we seek  to create and maintain a positive and productive learning and working environment, that is, an environment in which there is:

  • respect for the dignity of all persons
  • fair and equitable treatment of individuals in our diverse community
  • personal integrity and trustworthiness
  • respect for academic freedom
  • respect for personal and University property

Students may be expected to read, respect, consider and discuss materials that they find challenging on a number of accounts, whether this is because of sexually explicit content, controversial ideas, or unfamiliar world views. Critical thinking is encouraged. Racism, sexism, homophobia, and classism of any kind will not be tolerated. Please turn off your cel phones before coming in to class. Laptops may be used in the classroom for note-taking purposes only. If you wish to watch a movie or engage in on-line chat, please leave the room to do so.

The email address provided above may be used solely for housekeeping purposes.  Students wishing to discuss substantive questions of any kind must come see me during office hours.

Additional Ground Rules:

To be negotiated in the first week. Consider what you need (and what is reasonable) for you to feel safe and be productive in the classroom.

Grading system:

The following grading system is used in this course:

A+ (90-100%); A (85-89%); A- (80-84%); B+ (76-79%); B (72-75%); B- (68-71%);

C+ (64-67%); C (60-63%); C- (55-59%); D (50-54%); F (0-49%).

Late assignment policy:

Assignments submitted after the deadline will be penalized with the loss of a third of grade (e.g.: A- to B+) for each day late.

Academic Dishonesty:

Please take note of the University of British Columbia policy and do not plagiarize. Using any source whatsoever without clearly documenting it is a serious academic offense. Consequences include failure on the assignment, failure in the course and possible suspension or expulsion from the university.

Reading:

It is your responsibility to have read the text under discussion on the day it is discussed in class. Longer texts will not necessarily be discussed in a linear fashion. Expect spoilers.

Weekly Schedule

Week 1:  ”Vigil” and “Other Honey”

Sept. 9 (Wed.) Introductions, course goals, screening of “Vigil” and “Other Honey”

Sept. 11 (Fri.)  Lecture

Anderson, Benedict. “Introduction.” Imagined Communities. London: Verso, 1983. 1-7.

Gagnon, Monika. “Introduction: Another Conundrum? “  Other Conundrums: Race,

Culture and Canadian Art. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp, 2000. 21-30.

Group discussion.

Week 2: What We All Long For

Sept. 14 (Mon.)  Lecture: What We All Long For

Sept. 16 (Wed.)  Lecture:

Massey, Doreen. “A Question of Place.” A Place in the World: Places, Culture and

Globalization. Eds. Doreen Massey and Pat Jess. Oxford: OUP, 1996. 46-62.

Group discussion.

Sept. 18 (Fri.) Reading Quiz #1

Lecture:

Fuss, Diana. “The Risk of Essence.” Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and

Difference. New York: Routledge, 1989. 1-22.

Week 3: What We All Long For

Sept. 21 (Mon.)  Lecture:

Appadurai, Arjun. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.”

Modernity At Large:  Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis:

University of Minnesota Press, 1996. 27-47.

Sept. 22 Last date for withdrawal without W standing

Sept. 23 (Wed.)  Lecture:

Freud, Sigmund. “The ‘Uncanny’.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological

Works of Sigmund Freud. Ed. James Strachey. Vol. 17. London: Vintage, 2001.

219-252.

Sept. 25 (Fri.)  Official presentation groups formed (8 X 4 + 4 X 3), presentation dates assigned.

Maximum group size = 4, minimum group size = 3. Please let me know

immediately if your group contains more than 4 or fewer than 3 people. Group

discussion.

Week 4: What We All Long For

Sept. 28 (Mon.) Lecture:

Bhabha, Homi. “Introduction.”  The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994. 1-18.

Sept. 30 (Wed.)  Lecture:

Agamben, Giorgio. “Introduction.” Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life.

Stanford: Stanford UP, 1995. 1-12.

Oct. 2 (Fri.)  Reading Quiz #2, discussion groups

Week 5: The Letter Opener

Oct. 5 (Mon.)   Lecture: The Letter Opener

Oct. 7 (Wed.)    Lecture:

Brown, Bill. “Thing Theory.” Critical Inquiry. 28 (2001) : 1-22.

Oct. 9 (Fri.)              Group Presentation #1:­­­___________________________________________

Week 6

Oct. 12 (Mon.) Thanksgiving. University closed.

Oct. 14 (Wed.)   In-class essay (one question from a choice of several, open book)

Oct. 16 (Fri.) Peer assessment of in-class essay. Attendence will be taken and heavily weighted today.

Week 7: The Letter Opener

Oct. 19 (Mon.) Lecture

Kristeva, Julia. “Toccata and Fugue for the Foreigner.” Strangers to Ourselves. New

York: Columbia UP, 1991. 1-40.

Oct. 21 (Wed.)  Group Presentation #2:______________________________________

Oct. 23 (Fri.)  Group Presentation #3:______________________________________

Week 8: Soucouyant

Oct. 26 (Mon.) Lecture: Soucouyant (Chariandy visit)

Oct. 28 (Wed.) Reading Quiz #3, Lecture

Renan, Ernst. “What is a Nation?” Becoming National: A Reader. Eds. Geoff Eley and

Ronald Grigor Suny. New York: OUP, 1996. 41-55.

West, Cornel. “The New Cultural Politics of Difference.” Out There: Marginalization and

Contemporary Cultures. New York: MIT Press, 1990. 19-50.

Oct. 30 (Fri.)  Group Presentation #4: _______________________________________

Week 9: Soucouyant

Nov. 2 (Mon.) Group Presentation #5: ______________________________

Nov. 4 (Wed.)  Group Presentation #6:­­­­­­­­­_______________________________________

Nov. 6 (Fri.)  Reading Quiz #4, discussion groups

Week 10: Burning Vision

Nov. 9 (Mon.)  Burning Vision

Nov. 11 (Wed.)  Group Presentation #7:­­­­_______________________________________

Nov. 13 Group Presentation #8:_______________________________________

Week 11: Burning Vision

Nov. 16 (Mon.) Burning Vision (Village of Widows screening)

Nov. 18 (Wed.) Group Presentation #9:________________________________________

Nov. 20 (Fri.)  Reading Quiz # 5, discussion groups

Week 12: Delible

Nov. 23 (Mon.)  Delible (Stone visit)

Nov. 25 (Wed.)  Group Presentation #10:­­­­­__________________________________________

Nov. 27 (Fri.)  Group Presentation #11:_________________________________________

Week 13: Delible

Nov. 30 (Mon.)  Delible lecture, Quiz #6

Dec. 2 (Wed.) Group Presentation #12: ____________________________________

Dec. 4 (Fri.)  Wrap up, future directions, party

Final Paper or Project due, Participation Portfolio due